Abstract
The principle of equal protection is a fundamental component of constitutional law and democratic governance. It ensures that all individuals are treated equally before the law and that the state does not engage in arbitrary discrimination. One of the most significant areas in which this principle operates is the issue of gender discrimination. Historically, women and other gender groups have faced systemic discrimination in social, political, and economic spheres. Legal systems often reinforced such inequalities by creating laws and policies that restricted women's rights and opportunities. However, the development of constitutional guarantees of equality and the evolution of human rights jurisprudence have gradually challenged these discriminatory practices. The doctrine of equal protection plays a vital role in addressing gender inequality by requiring governments to justify any law that differentiates between individuals on the basis of gender. Courts have increasingly recognized that gender-based classifications are often rooted in stereotypes and historical disadvantages. As a result, judicial interpretation of equality provisions has become an important mechanism for eliminating discriminatory laws and promoting gender justice. Constitutional courts across various jurisdictions have examined issues such as employment discrimination, unequal service conditions, workplace restrictions, and discriminatory policies affecting women. In many countries, constitutional provisions explicitly prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex or gender. In India, for instance, Articles 14, 15, and 16 of the Constitution collectively guarantee equality before the law and prohibit discrimination in matters of public life and employment. Judicial decisions interpreting these provisions have significantly contributed to the development of gender equality jurisprudence. Courts have emphasized that laws based on outdated social assumptions about the roles of men and women cannot be justified within a constitutional framework that prioritizes equality and dignity. Despite significant legal progress, gender discrimination continues to persist in different forms, including unequal employment opportunities, wage disparities, and limited representation in decision-making institutions. Addressing these issues requires not only strong legal frameworks but also effective implementation and social awareness. The principle of equal protection therefore remains a powerful tool for challenging discriminatory practices and promoting substantive equality. This study examines the relationship between equal protection and gender discrimination. focusing on the role of constitutional interpretation and judicial decisions in advancing gender justice. By analyzing legal developments and constitutional principles, the research highlights how courts contribute to the elimination of discriminatory laws and the promotion of equality in modern democratic societies.